Re: [RFC] Making compound pages mandatory

From: David Howells
Date: Wed Nov 17 2004 - 06:49:04 EST



> Yes, it's just the single pointer chase. Probably that's the common case
> now, because everyone will be enabling hugepages on lots of architectures.

No, it's not just the single pointer chase. See my email to Linus.

I would, however, be willing to endorse the use of PG_compound, especially
under !MMU conditions for two reasons:

(1) Safety. The current mechanism of managing intermediate pages is
potentially fragile under uClinux.

(2) put_page() and get_page() aren't actually called all that often compared
to other things, especially under uClinux.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/