Re: [PATCH 12/14] FRV: Generate more useful debug info

[David Howells]

> Generates rejects against Sam's tree and appears to be unrelated to FRV,
> yes?

I know not Sam's tree.

It's a generic thing. "gcc -g" does not cause compiled .S files to include
debugging information, and -O1 optimised code is more debuggable than -O2
optimised code.

> Are you sure that all architectures want this?  And that their toolchains
> will continue to work correctly?  And that it doesn't break older gcc's and
> that kgdb will continue to work correctly, etc?

-O1: Dunno; if they don't they're buggy, and if they don't they're buggy.

-Wa,--gdwarf2: No, no and no.

I can move the -Wa flag back into the frv arch if you insist, but moving the
-O1 flag there is more tricky, since it'd then be overridden in master
Makefile.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/