Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains

[Nick Piggin]

Erich Focht wrote:

> > I personally like the hierarchical idea.  Machine topologies tend to
> > look tree-like, and every useful sched_domain layout I've ever seen has
> > been tree-like.  I think our interface should match that.
>
>
> I like the hierarchical idea, too. The natural way to build it would
> be by starting from the cpus and going up. This tree stands on its
> leafs... and I'm not sure how to express that in a filesystem.

Why would you ever want to play around with the internals of the
thing though? Provided you have a way to create exclusive sets of
CPUs, when would you care about doing more?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/