Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thursday, October 7, 2004 8:02 am, Patrick Gefre wrote:
> > They should each be separate cleanup patches.  What I've done in the past
> > is make copies (in this case 5) of the big patch.  Then I edit all of
> > them to include only the hunks I want there.  Hopefully that'll minimize
> > the pain of respinning the big patch (i.e. no respin).  Also, Tony
> > doesn't want to deal with the above files, patches for them should be
> > sent to Andrew as separate mails with lkml in the cc list.
>
> These are not cleanup.
>
> The mmtimer code and sn_console include a file that doesn't exist anymore
> in the directory included - it's moved to somewhere else in the 002 patch.
>
> snsc.c, sgiioc4.c have changes for things that won't exist after this patch
> is applied.

Yeah, sorry, I shouldn't have said cleanup, fixup is better.  Anyway, they 
need to be separate since they'll be going into the tree via Andrew not Tony.

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/