Re: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug?

[Richard B. Johnson]

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Iau, 2004-10-07 at 15:07, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
> > > Much can change between the select() and recvmsg - things outside of
> > > kernel control too, and it's long been known.
> >
> > There is no change; the current implementation just checks the validity of
> > the data in the recvmsg() call and not during select().
>
> The accept one is documented by Stevens and well known. In the UDP case
> currently we could get precise behaviour - by halving performance of UDP
> applications like video streaming. We probably don't want to  because we
> can respond intelligently to OOM situations by freeing the queue if we
> don't enforce such a silly rule.

Well if you accept(pun_intended) what Stevens says, then check his
web-site on what he teaches about select() and sockets. His demo
code certainly requires that select() not fail.


Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.5-1.358-noreg on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips).
            Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/