Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)

[Alan Cox]

On Iau, 2004-10-07 at 08:05, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Thanks to BitKeeper no properly-tagged branch is ever dead.
> > Anyone could make a 2.6.8.2 if they so chose.
>   But it would be pointless without offical blessing from Linus.

Pray how do you thing the 2.0.x-ac kernel series started. Yes it
would be ".2ce" but people will judge code by whether it works and over
time. Linus doesn't have infinite time to bless each small change

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/