Re: Preempt? (was Re: Cannot enable DMA on SATA drive (SCSI-libsata,VIA SATA))

[Jeff Sipek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 06 October 2004 02:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If your implied answer is true, then we wouldn't need
> > preempt_{en,dis}able() sprinkled throughout the code so much.
>
> Where?
>
> It's less than I expected, actually.

Same here. Did you take into account things like rcu_read_lock()?

Jeff Sipek.

- -- 
Don't drink and derive. Alcohol and algebra don't mix.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBY/VQwFP0+seVj/4RAnCzAKCovAcfr8TFLzQ0xkjPnNtXm7UlygCggWtO
76FhTdx4AvYlBy1qNmR9G3I=
=JKNi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/