Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

[Paul Jackson]

Martin wrote:
> I'd think the problems would be easier to tackle if the systems knew
> about each other, and talked to each other.

Clear boundaries should be enough.  If each instance of CKRM is assured
that it has control of some subset of a system that's separate and
non-overlapping, with all Memory, CPU, Tasks, and Allowed masks of said
Tasks either wholly owned by that CKRM instance, or entirely outside,
then that should do it, right?

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/