Re: [PATCH] -mm swsusp: copy_page is harmfull

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > 	[PATCH] -mm swsusp: copy_page is harmfull
> > 	
> > 	From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> > 	
> > 	This is my fault from long time ago: copy_page can't be used for copying
> > 	task struct, therefore we can't use it in swsusp.
> 
> Hi !
> 
> Just curious, but why ?

Nigel already provided right explanation.

> It would be useful to have this in platform code, I don't see why I couldn't
> use copy_page() on ppc and I suspect it will be more efficient than memcpy
> since it has specific optimisations due to the fact that we are known to be
> fully aligned and the size of the copy is a constant aligned power of 2.

Hmm but does it matter? Is that operation really that slow on ppc?
This whole copy takes maybe second on x86, other operations are way
slower...
									Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/