Re: [BUG] ub.c badness in current bk

[Pete Zaitcev]

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:06:01 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using address 2
> ub: sizeof ub_scsi_cmd 60 ub_dev 924
> uba: device 2 capacity nsec 50 bsize 512
> uba: made changed
> uba: device 2 capacity nsec 126720 bsize 512
> uba: device 2 capacity nsec 126720 bsize 512
>  uba: uba1
>  uba: uba1
> kobject_register failed for uba1 (-17)
> Call trace:
>  [8000ba5c] dump_stack+0x18/0x28
>  [80132a04] kobject_register+0x68/0x6c
>  [80094e34] add_partition+0xdc/0x100
>  [80094ff8] register_disk+0x134/0x13c
>  [801866d4] add_disk+0x58/0x74
>  [c211a070] ub_probe+0x250/0x2c0 [ub]

I'll look tomorrow. These duplicated messages are suspicious, something
must be racing.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/