Re: [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat Aug 28 2004 - 01:43:28 EST


William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> void fastcall unlock_page(struct page *page)
> >> {
> >> + unsigned long *word = (unsigned long *)&page->flags;
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:17:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This will break if a little-endian 64-bit architecture elects to use a
> > 32-bit page_flags_t.
>
> You mean a big-endian one? I did check to be sure none did so; only
> x86-64 does. Easy enough to dress up so BE arches can do it too.
>

hm. Actually, the page_flags_t hack can only work on little-endian
hardware anyway.

perhaps your implementation should imitate x86_64/bitops.h and use a void*,
along with apologetic comments.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/