Re: reiser4 plugins

From: Hans Reiser
Date: Fri Aug 27 2004 - 13:18:53 EST


Nikita Danilov wrote:

Hans Reiser writes:
> Christophe Saout wrote:
> > >
> >
> >I don't know, ask Hans. How could the VFS know it a filesystem wants to
> >do something specific with a file that is completely transparent to the
> >VFS?
> >
> > > >
> To know what method to use, you must determine the pluginid, and then > find the method within that plugin for that vfs operation.
> > As for overhead, well, who eats whose dust in the benchmarks....?

Whoever sponsors the benchmark usually wins. Had you forgotten that
mongo setup used by http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html was specially
`tuned' to reach peak reiser4 performance? Remember why you decided to
turn OVERWRITE and MODIFY phases off? People on #reiser4 report 90
_second_ stalls with reiser4 under high io loads (large atom is
obviously being flushed and everyone waits on it...). In my opinion, it
is such things that are of utmost importance for real reiser4
acceptance, not how to name `metas' sub-directory.

Nikita.




If you ask real users, they say that reiser4 is fast, and their experience matches our benchmark. You can criticize the benchmark if you want, but then you should run your own and publish it.

There are still plenty of things needing fixing though, and you are right that they are more important than the pretext being attempted for keeping us out of the kernel. Probably you could supply them with many superior pretexts.;-)

The 90 second stalls, those should be fixed by debugging copy on capture and turning it on, yes? You can hardly claim I failed to push for the completion of copy on capture.... and of course the reason it is not done is simply that there is too much to do.... I (sincerely) hope vs enjoys his vacation, the whole team is working too hard. I am doing 7 day weeks now to try to make payroll for us and keep darpa happy at the same time.

fsync performance needs fixing badly, and Chris is right in his diagnosis of what we can do to fix it.

Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/