Re: [PATCH] add scheduler domains for ia64

[Nick Piggin]

Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Saturday, August 14, 2004 8:54 pm, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > Yeah, all the SD_*_INIT values are overridable. We could even say, put
> > in an SD_NODE2_INIT for a 2nd level NUMA domain in the generic code,
> > for example.
>
>
> Yeah, we'll need different values for each level in the hierarchy.
>
>
> > I'd say your closest-node setup would probably get close to what you want.
> > The main thing you want is to not do huge amounts of balancing work in
> > interrupt context, and also not to move a task from one side of the
> > system to the other when one node is a little bit out of balance.
> >
> > I guess if you want to do anything fancier then we can take a look at
> > re-exporting the domain setup.
>
>
> Ok, sounds good.  How does this look?  It sits on top of 2.6.8.1-mm1, ripping 
> out the ia64 specific bits and moving things to sched.c.  I've also added an 
> ia64 specific SD_NODE_INIT and an #if !defined to sched.c

Sorry I haven't replied earlier.  I think this looks good, provided
it does the right thing for you (I can't test it myself). Send it to
Andrew to get merged if you'd like.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/