Re: [patch] enums to clear suspend-state confusion

[Alan Cox]

On Mer, 2004-08-18 at 01:27, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I can replace suspend_state_t with enum system_state, but it might
> mean that enum system_state will have to be extended with things like
> RUNTIME_PM_PCI_D0 in future... I guess that's easiest thing to do. It
> solves all the problems we have *now*.

Can you not also provide a function

	pci_state_for(system_state)

then most of the drivers don't have to care. It would also be nice
to have a driver flag to indicate which devices can simply be
hotunplug/hotreplugged over a suspend and don't need extra duplicate
code.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/