Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0

[Lee Revell]

On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 04:07, Roger Luethi wrote:

> > Also, isn't there a better solution than for network drivers to actively 
> > poll for changes in link status?  Can't they just register a callback that 
> 
> For the Rhine, there is, but making it work requires some extra black
> magic we didn't know until a few months ago. It's fixed in -mm now and
> will probably be in 2.6.9.

Which of the broken out patches from -mm should I apply to get this
fix?  Should I just apply all the ones that touch via-rhine.c?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/