RE: cciss update [1 of 6]

[Miller, Mike (OS Dev)]

Sorry, I thought the descriptions in the patch were sufficient. 
Again, I wish viro would copy me on patches to cciss. Isn't that the normal protocol, include the maintainer in any updates?

mikem

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 6:29 PM
To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: cciss update [1 of 6]


"Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <mike.miller@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Patch 1 of 6
> Name: p001_ioctl32_fix_for_268rc2.patch

It would make life easier for me if you could give each patch a nice
Subject: which describes what it does.  "cciss update [N of 6]" isn't very
meaningful.  And the name of the file into which you chose to place the
patch isn't a suitable description either.  Thanks.

All of these patches are generating rejects for me - eager beavers have
been patching your driver when you weren't looking.  Could you please redo
and reissue the patch series against -rc3?

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/