Re: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL (fwd)

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 08:14:59 EST


On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:56:01AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2004-08-03 at 01:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > OTOH, at least XFS is known to have problems with 4kb stacks - and you
> > don't want such problems to occur in production environments.
>
> So put && !4KSTACKS in the XFS configuration ?

I originally did this additionally (including moving 4KSTACKS
above XFS).

But independent of the XFS problem, 4kb stacks currently risk additional
breakage without real benefits for most users.

That sounds like a perfect place for using EXPERIMENTAL to me.

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/