Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop

[Marc Ballarin]

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:05:34 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> 
> Ideally, we'd ship a requirements and specification document that
> describes the security trade-offs of cryptoloop/dm-crypt in some
> detail. There are way too many unstated assumptions here.
> 

Indeed. I have just tried to start a discussion of the future design goals
on the dm-crypt mailinglist.

If you are not subscribed see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.dm-crypt/379

Regards
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/