Re: drm - first steps towards 64-bit correctness..
From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Sat Jul 31 2004 - 04:59:32 EST
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 11:32, Eric Anholt wrote:
> As long as you don't use the linux-y
> "u32"-type types, BSD should be happy with the changes.
can you explain why u32 would be outlawed? Surely it's trivial to do a
typedef for u32 on BSD for drm ??
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part