Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc2-L2, preemptable hardirqs

From: Lee Revell
Date: Wed Jul 28 2004 - 01:19:28 EST


On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 00:59, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The obvious next feature to add would be to make certain IRQs
> > non-schedulable, like you would for an RT system. For an audio system
> > this would be just the soundcard interrupt (and timer as stated
> > above). Then, while it still might not be hard-RT, it would blow away
> > anything achievable on the other OS'es people do audio work with.
>
> yes, this is the next step. Does v=3 work on your system? (even if the
> delaying of the soundcard irq causes latencies.)
>

Yes, it works well, except for this behavior which is as expected. I
will test making this interrupt 'direct' tomorrow, it is not shared with
anything too heavy.

Lee



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/