Re: 2.6.7-bk: asm/setup.h and linux/init.h

[Paul Jackson]

Could someone speak a few words on why a patch such as this is
desirable?

Apparently, there is more value to avoiding non-essential include's than
I realize.  I'd have preferred doing a memcpy of "sizeof(some_struct)"
over doing it for SOME_STRUCT_SIZE constant, and I'd have thought it
appropriate to include whatever header files were needed to do that.

The simple "wc -l" size of the kernel source goes up a couple of lines,
the code complexity is unchanged, and the generated code is unchanged. 
So obviously none of those factors motivate this change.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/