Re: [PATCH] Stop printk printing non-printable chars

[David Woodhouse]

On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 00:02 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> The 0x9b character must be blocked, 

Why do you say 'must be blocked' instead of 'should not be printed'?

The former implies some kind of post-processing to work around buggy
kernel code printing crap. Surely it's better just to refrain from
printing the crap in the first place?

Btw, your replies lack a correct References: and In-Reply-To: header, in
violation of a 'SHOULD' in RFC2822 Â3.6.4. Please fix this if you wish
to participate in public fora.

-- 
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/