Re: DMA API issues

[Matt Porter]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:59:02PM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> I have a System On Chip device which, among other functions, contains an
> OHCI controller and 32K of SRAM.
> 
> heres the catch:- The OHCI controller has a different address space than
> the host bus, and worse, can *only* DMA data from its internal SRAM.
> 
> The architecture is not broken, merely unusual.
> 
> This causes the following problems:
> 
> 1) The DMA API provides no methods to set up a mapping between the host
>    memory map and the devices view of the space
>         example:
>            the OHCI controller above would see its 32K of SRAM as
>            mapped from 0x10000 - 0x1ffff and not 0xXXX10000 - 0xXXX1ffff
>            which is the address the CPU sees.
> 2) The DMA API assumes the device can access SDRAM
>         example:
>            the OHCI controller base is mapped at 0x10000000 on my platform.
>            this is NOT is SDRAM, its in IO space.

Can't you just implement an arch-specific allocator for your 32KB
SRAM, then implement the DMA API streaming and dma_alloc/free APIs
on top of that?  Since this architecture is obviously not designed
for performance, it doesn't seem to be a big deal to have the streaming
APIs copy to/from the kmalloced (or whatever) buffer to/from the SRAM
allocated memory and then have those APIs return the proper dma_addr_t
for the embedded OHCI's address space view of the SRAM. Same thing
goes for implementing dma_alloc/free (used by dma_pool*). I don't
have the knowledge of USB subsystem buffer usage to know how quickly
that little 32KB of SRAM is going to run out. But at a DMA API level,
this seems doable, albeit with the greater possibility of negative
retvals from these calls.

-Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/