Re: [RFC PATCH] explicitly mark recursion count

[viro]

On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:58:32PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> Note the "in the most general case" part.  You can get things right if
> you make some assumptions and those assumptions are actually valid.
> In my case the assumptions are:
> 1. all relevant function pointers are stuffed into some struct and

Wrong.  They are often passed as arguments to generic helpers, without
being ever put into any structures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/