Re: bringing back 'make symlinks'?

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Sun May 30 2004 - 05:54:26 EST


On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:47:51PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> The way things are now, I can build toolchains for everything
> except the sh architecture (though my toolchain bootstrap script
> is ugly as noted due to the lack of 'make symlinks').

Does the following meet the needs of your cross-tool scripts?

Sam

===== Makefile 1.492 vs edited =====
--- 1.492/Makefile 2004-05-30 08:24:06 +02:00
+++ edited/Makefile 2004-05-30 12:52:36 +02:00
@@ -632,6 +632,10 @@
# All the preparing..
prepare-all: prepare0 prepare

+# symlinks provided for compatibility with 2.4 - this allows boot-strapping
+# tool chains to be simpler
+symlinks: prepare-all
+
# Leave this as default for preprocessing vmlinux.lds.S, which is now
# done in arch/$(ARCH)/kernel/Makefile

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/