Re: Cleanups for APIC

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 09:14:19 EST



* Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The I/O APIC need not be hooked to PCI ;-) -- I'm not sure about the
> i82093AA, but that's definitely true for the i82489DX. The call to
> io_apic_sync() is needed for masking to make sure interrupts won't be
> dispatched after returning from the call -- this is not needed for
> unmasking as a delay here is harmless.

well, an APIC message could be on the way to the CPU even with this
synchronization. Does it matter whether it's a newly dispatched one due
to POST delays or an in-fly one due to APIC bus delays?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/