Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission

[Arjan van de Ven]

> explanation part of the patch. That sign-off would be just a single line 
> at the end (possibly after _other_ peoples sign-offs), saying:
> 
> 	Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

well this obviously needs to include that you signed off on the DCO and
not some other random piece of paper, and it probably should include the
DCO revision number you signed off on.
Without the former the Signed-off-by: line is entirely empty afaics,
without the later we're not future proof.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part