Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission

[Francis J. A. Pinteric]

On Mon, 24 May 2004 13:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In other words: this is not about changing the way we work. It's about
> documenting the things we take for granted. So that outsiders can be
> shown how it works.
> 

Personally, I'd like to see this evolve into something along the lines
of ISO-9000. If linux development can have the ability to create
detailed audit trails of code changes there would never be a question
about who contributed what and who owns it.

It would be nice if some sort of ISO-9000 compliance were a long term
goal here. The proprietary software houses would go nuts.

>>>---fja->


-- 
If you think what I'm saying is "politically incorrect",
you've got the wrong politics.

Tired of `netiquette'? Fed up with endless discussion of
what is '[OT]'? Linux, Free/Open Source discussion without
the "political correctness:" http://linuxdoctor.dyndns.org/list.html

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature