Re: [PATCH] scaled-back caps, take 4

[Martin Schlemmer]

> > And no, I don't think this patch is necessary, or that it should be
> > applied or used by itself.  I think it makes a good starting point to
> > fix caps
> > (which a lot of people seem to think are broken).
> 
> Well, I know, that I don't have a strong following. :-)
> 

It might just be that not many are familiar with the code, or really
care.  If your patch really have 100% the same behaviour as the
original, and maybe some comments might be added as in how things
work, it can really help future debugging/additions/whatever, as
its so much easier (IMHO, not really caring much myself, but somebody
looking is better than nobody).  You might check with Andrew if he
wants to kick it around a bit in -mm ... ?


Cheers,

-- 
Martin Schlemmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part