Re: [PATCH] iso9660 inodes beyond 4GB

[Andrew Morton]

Paul Serice <paul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  > Dumb question: why not simply use a 64-bit type in the inode?
> 
> I wasn't sure how to proceed in this direction, but I'll give it
> another shot.

The operative part of that question was "dumb".  I don't know isofs, so
don't go redoing things on that basis if you think the current code is the
best approach.

>  > It goes 404.  Please just send the patch directly to the mailing
>  > list.
> 
> Sorry.  I didn't think my post(s) made it to the list.  So, I took the
> patch down.

The mail server was sick - please send the patch and its full description.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/