Re: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel

[Chris Wright]

* Shailabh (nagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> In CKRM, the premise is that the privileged user defines the way 
> processes get grouped and could do so in a way that leads to rapid 
> changes in group membership. So having group control/monitoring 
> policies implemented as an externally loaded module (not talking of 
> scheduler modifications as modules, which is a no-no)  is not a 
> palatable option.

Yes, this is why I looked at the PAGG job module.  I was looking for how
it might have mucked (externally) with scheduler.  At any rate, I found
all the primitives for joining/leaving/defining groups here which I'd
have expected closer to core.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/