Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 03:52:49 EST


On Fri, 2004-04-30 04:04:17 -0400, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message <40920881.6070300@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Marc Boucher wrote:
> >On Apr 30, 2004, at 12:43 AM, Sean Estabrooks wrote:

> It's strictly a cost-based function for a business. If a business can
> achieve Linux support for free, without paying driver and support
> engineers, they do so.

That's letting docs leak out of the company:)

> DriverLoader significantly lowers that cost, while not providing an open
> source solution at all.

Right:(

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature