Re: 2.6.6-rc{1,2} bad VM/NFS interaction in case of dirty page writeback

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:48:21AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Another thing I think XFS could make good use of on the generic
> buffered IO path would be mpage_readpages and mpage_writepages
> variants that can use a get_blocks_t (like the direct IO path)
> instead of the single-block-at-a-time get_block_t interface thats
> used now.  The existence of such beasts would probably impact the
> direction xfs_aops.c takes a fair bit I'd guess Christoph?

For mpage_readpages - yes.  To use mpage_writepages from XFS I'd need
a large-scale rewrite to handle delayed allocations and unwritten extents,
so at least for the 2.6.x timeframe we're probably better of keeping our
own ->writepages inside XFS.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/