Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:53:29 +0900
From: Go Taniguchi <go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Turbolinx Inc.
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.6.6-rc2-mm2 + Adaptec I2O
Hi,
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Andrew Morton wrote:
>> | Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> |
>> |> on this URL [http://www.smartcgi.com/?action=docs,kernel26-adaptec] you
>> |> can find a patch that I could successfully path again 2.6.5 (vanilla)
>> |> and compile successfully.
>> |
>> |
>> | hm. Against 2.6.0. Go, would you have time to send that patch in to the
>> | scsi team at linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
>>
>> yes,
>>
>> remark:
>>
>> ~ Originally this patch has been released by Go Taniguchi at
>> http://pkgcvs.turbolinux.co.jp/~go/patch-2.6/dpt_i2o.patch
>>
>> patch attached
>
>
> Sorry, my question was directed to Go Taniguchi <go@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - Go
> should submit the patch.
Yea, I sent an mail to LKML in the end of last year regarding this issue.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107275564119915&w=2
However, I think that Adaptec probably just re-make a new version of dpt_i2o.
My patch may differ from the Adaptec policy.
I thought that it may be good for someone need the driver before Adaptec
completed the driver. What's why I uploaded my patch onto web.
The number of the access is over 1000 now after I counted it.
Please merge to Andrew's tree if Adaptec does not mind.
This is my patch same as send from Clemens.
http://pkgcvs.turbolinux.co.jp/~go/patch-2.6/dpt_i2o.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Attachment:
dpt_i2o-2.5.0-2317.tgz
Description: application/compressed