Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

From: Robert M. Stockmann
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 19:57:31 EST


On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Tim Hockin wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:18:59AM +0200, Robert M. Stockmann wrote:
> > > This is possible with any structure, named or unnamed. It's called an
> > > ABI, and it's one of the reasons that binary modules suck. It doesn't
> > > have *anything* to do with unnamed structures. At all. And if you think
> > > so, show me code.
> >
> > here's a example :
> >
> > http://www.promise.com/support/file/driver/1_fasttrak_tx4000_partial_source_1.00.0.19.zip
>
> Care to show me where they use unnamed structures, and how it has anything
> to do with binary modules?

fasttrak.h :

/*********************************************************************

fasttrak.h -- PROMISE FastTrak Controllers device driver for Linux.

Copyright (C) 2002-2005 PROMISE Technology, Inc.

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.

Bugs/Comments/Suggestions should be mailed to:
support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For more information, goto:
http://www.promise.com

*********************************************************************/

#ifndef _ft3xx_h
#define _ft3xx_h

#include <linux/version.h>

#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,0)
#define ft3xx { \
next: NULL, \
proc_dir: NULL, \
proc_info: NULL, \
name: "ft3xx", \
detect: ft3xx_detect, \
release: ft3xx_release, \
ioctl: ft3xx_ioctl, \
info: NULL, \
command: NULL, \
queuecommand: ft3xx_queuecommand, \
eh_abort_handler : ft3xx_abort_eh, \
eh_device_reset_handler : ft3xx_reset_eh, \
abort: ft3xx_abort, \
reset: ft3xx_reset, \
slave_attach: NULL, \
bios_param: ft3xx_bios_param, \
can_queue: Can_Queue, /* max simultaneous cmds */\
this_id: 7, /* scsi id of host adapter */\
sg_tablesize: Max_SG_Table - 2,/* max scatter-gather cmds */\
cmd_per_lun: 1, /* cmds per lun (linked cmds) */\
present: 0, \
unchecked_isa_dma: 0, /* no memory DMA restrictions */\
use_clustering: 0, \
use_new_eh_code: 0, /* enable this field next time*/\
emulated: 0, \
proc_name: "ft3xx" \
}
#else
#define ft3xx { \
next: NULL, \
proc_dir: NULL, \
proc_info: NULL, \
name: "ft3xx", \
detect: ft3xx_detect, \
release: ft3xx_release, \
ioctl: ft3xx_ioctl, \
info: NULL, \
command: NULL, \
queuecommand: ft3xx_queuecommand, \
eh_abort_handler : ft3xx_abort_eh, \
eh_device_reset_handler : ft3xx_reset_eh, \
abort: ft3xx_abort, \
reset: ft3xx_reset, \
slave_attach: NULL, \
bios_param: ft3xx_bios_param, \
can_queue: Can_Queue, /* max simultaneous cmds */\
this_id: 7, /* scsi id of host adapter */\
sg_tablesize: Max_SG_Table - 2, /* max scatter-gather cmds */\
cmd_per_lun: 1, /* cmds per lun (linked cmds) */\
present: 0, \
unchecked_isa_dma: 0, /* no memory DMA restrictions */\
use_clustering: 0, \
use_new_eh_code: 0, /* enable this field next time*/\
emulated: 0, \
}
#endif


#endif /* _ft3xx_h */


This header file is needed to be able to link ft3xx.o . In which way binary
incompatibility is introduced, inside this case is hard to tell. We
will never know i guess , since the type and size of the above components
is hidden inside the binary only part :

-rw-r--r-- 1 stock stock 227757 Oct 13 2003 ftlib.o

Well it works, with gcc-3.x, but not with gcc-2.95.3

>
> > Opaque types should be no problem. However the complete definition must reside
> > somewhere _inside_ the complete source. Opaque types is even a bless, i agree.
>
> If you're open, then yes. If you're not open, you could have the
> definition of the opaque type inside your own closed code, and things will
> still work. In fact, that's the sane way to do closed structures.
>

Hardware which uses these things inside its linux drivers, is hardware
i would never run Linux on.

Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@xxxxxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/