Re: [PATCH COW] sys_copyfile

From: Jörn Engel
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 11:49:16 EST


On Tue, 27 April 2004 10:58:25 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>
> > With warm cache, copyfile() is about 10% faster
>
> Over the network it would be a lot more than that.

True, if network traffic is saved as well.

> in do_copyfile all I would need would be an op that looks a bit like
> rename (the cifs vfs part of the changes, to fs/cifs/cifssmb.c mostly,
> would be trivial) e.g.:
>
> int do_copyfile(struct nameidata *old_nd, struct nameidata *new_nd,
> struct dentry *new_dentry, umode_t mode)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (!old_nd->dentry->d_inode)
> return -ENOENT;
> if (!S_ISREG(old_nd->dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> return -EINVAL;
> /* FIXME: replace with proper permission check */
> if (new_dentry->d_inode)
> return -EEXIST;
>
> + if(old_nd->dentry->d_inode->i_op->copy) {
> + ret = old_dir->i_op->copy(old_nd->dentry,
> + mode, new_dentry);
> + }

Shouldn't it be rather

if (old_nd->dentry->d_inode->i_op->copy)
return old_nd->dentry->d_inode->i_op->copy(old_nd->dentry,
mode, new_dentry);

or something similar? The copy() effectively replaces the complete
create/sendfile/possibly-unlink series.

>
> if(!ret)
> return ret;
> else
> ret = vfs_create(new_nd->dentry->d_inode,
> new_dentry, mode, new_nd);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> ret = copy_data(old_nd->dentry, old_nd->mnt, new_dentry,
> new_nd->mnt);
>
> if (ret) {
> int error = vfs_unlink(new_nd->dentry->d_inode,
> new_dentry);
> BUG_ON(error);
> /* FIXME: not sure if there are return value we
> should not BUG()
> * on */
> }
> return ret;
> }
>

Jörn

--
The grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to
love, and something to hope for.
-- Allan K. Chalmers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/