Re: [somewhat OT] binary modules agaaaain
From: Andrew McGregor
Date: Fri Apr 23 2004 - 06:30:26 EST
And it must, if only because there are laws that require some device
drivers to be binary only.
I kid you not, take a look at the FCC software radio rules. Some wireless
cards fall into their definition.
Wierd world, but there we go...
Andrew
--On Tuesday, 20 April 2004 5:08 p.m. +0200 Guennadi Liakhovetski
<gl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> A binary module is "considered good" if
This is a false assumption IMO no binary only modules can be "good".
I agree! That was just an idea to make Linux life easier __if__ it
__must__ live with binary modules.
Thanks
Guennadi
---------------------------------
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
---------
Andrew McGregor
Director, Scientific Advisor
IndraNet Technologies Ltd
http://www.indranet-technologies.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/