Re: tcp vulnerability? haven't seen anything on it here...

[Chris Friesen]

alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Nevertheless, number of packets to kill the session is still *large* 
> (under "best-case" for attacker, you need to send 2^30 packets)...

I though the whole point of this vulnerability was that you "only" needed to send 64K packets, not 2^30.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/