Re: -mmX 4G patches feedback

[Martin J. Bligh]

 Tuesday, April 06, 2004 00:16:41 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:35:23PM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote:
>> 4G of virtual address is what we need. Virtual address space is why the -mmX
>> 4G/4G patches are useful. In this application it is single processes (usually
> 
> Indeed.
> 
>> 3.5:1.5 appears to be a 2.4.x kernel patch only right?
> 
> Martin has a port for 2.6 in the -mjb patchset (though it only works
> with PAE disabled but there are patches floating around to make it work
> at not noticeable cost with PAE enabled too).

There's no such thing as 3.5:1.5. Do you mean 3.5:0.5? or 2.5:1.5? ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/