Re: [Patch 17/23] mask v2 = [6/7] nodemask_t_ia64_changes

[Paul Jackson]

Nick wrote:
> No, the schedule() fastpath doesn't use find_next_bit. 

Ok - makes sense - thanks.

Uninlining it is perhaps the easiest way out.

That or replacing it with the trivial version that is several times
smaller (loops one bit at a time, checking 'test_bit()').

Right now, I don't see any excuse for that fat version of find_next_bit()
to exist.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/