Re: Catching SIGSEGV with signal() in 2.6

[Chris Friesen]

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> bero@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > ... doesn't seem to be possible anymore.
> >
> > See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
> >
> > Is this change intentional, or a bug?
>
>
> On 2.6.3, x86, SIGSEGV is being caught just fine in my test program,
> with the correct fault address, with or without SA_SIGINFO.

SA_SIGINFO implies sigaction().  The original poster was talking about 
signal().

That said, it seems to work with 2.6.4 on ppc32.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/