Re: [PATCH] cowlinks v2

[Jörn Engel]

On Sat, 3 April 2004 14:15:39 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Could you not change it back to a normal inode when refcount becomes 1? 
> > > 
> > > You can only do that if the cowid object has a pointer to the last
> > > remaining reference to it.  That's possible, but more complicated and
> > > would incur a little more I/O per cow operation.
> > 
> > You'd have to have pointers to all references to it... because you
> > can't tell in advance which one will be the last to go away.
> 
> Exactly.  Each of the cow pointers would need to be linked in a doubly
> linked list containing them all.

I don't like the list idea.  Having the extra cowid (I prefer inode)
indirection costs a few bytes and one lookup, not much.  The list is
way too much overhead to get rid of so little in a few cases.

If you really want to, create a new syscall foldfile() that will
remove the indirection for one file, if possible.  Then userspace can
do the ugly work of scanning for single-linked cowids (or just leave
it).

Jörn

-- 
The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of
his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full
humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague. 
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/