Re: [Patch 6/23] mask v2 - Replace cpumask_t with one using mask

[Matthew Dobson]

On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:11, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Patch_6_of_23 - Rework cpumasks to use new mask ADT
> 	Removes many old include/asm-<arch> and asm-generic cpumask files
> 	Add intersects, subset, xor and andnot operators.
> 	Provides temporary emulators for obsolete const, promote, coerce
> 	Presents entire cpumask API clearly in single cpumask.h file

<snip>

> +#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
> +
> +#define	cpu_online_map		     cpumask_of_cpu(0)
> +#define	cpu_possible_map	     cpumask_of_cpu(0)

I mentioned earlier that there's probably a better way to do this for
UP...  What do you think about this?

-Matt
diff -Nurp --exclude-from=/home/mcd/.dontdiff linux-2.6.4-pj_mask_v2/include/linux/cpumask.h linux-2.6.4-UP_online_map/include/linux/cpumask.h
--- linux-2.6.4-pj_mask_v2/include/linux/cpumask.h	Fri Apr  2 14:03:21 2004
+++ linux-2.6.4-UP_online_map/include/linux/cpumask.h	Fri Apr  2 14:13:54 2004
@@ -134,8 +134,12 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
 
-#define	cpu_online_map		     cpumask_of_cpu(0)
-#define	cpu_possible_map	     cpumask_of_cpu(0)
+#define	cpu_online_map				\
+({						\
+	cpumask_t m = MASK_ALL1(NR_CPUS);	\
+	m;					\
+})
+#define	cpu_possible_map	     cpu_online_map
 
 #define num_online_cpus()	     1
 #define num_possible_cpus()	     1