Re: epoll reporting events when it hasn't been asked to

[Ben Mansell]

> It is a feature. epoll OR user events with POLLHUP|POLLERR so that even if
> the user sets the event mask to zero, it can still know when something
> like those abnormal condition happened. Which problem do you see with this?

What should the application do if it gets events that it didn't ask for?
If you choose to ignore them, the next time epoll_wait() is called it
will return instantly with these same messages, so the app will spin and
eat CPU.

The alternative is to put some kind of sanity-check wrapper around
epoll_wait() calls, and match the output with what the app asked for.
If epoll starts returning messages that it doesn't want, the only
alternative is to get heavy-handed and try to get epoll to shut up with
EPOLL_CTL_DEL on the file descriptor. But this seems like fighting
against the OS.

Perhaps it should only OR the user event with POLLHUP|POLLERR if
POLLIN or POLLOUT is set?


Ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/