Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a
> > value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing
> > purposes.)
> 
> I kept the old patch and made these changes. The results are much more
> consistent now 3+x CPU. I still get varyations of ~2GB/s, but I had
> this with older kernels too.

great.

now, could you try the following patch, against vanilla -mm5:

	redhat.com/~mingo/scheduler-patches/sched2.patch

this includes 'context balancing' and doesnt touch the NUMA async
balancing tunables. Do you get better performance than with stock -mm5?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/