Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!
> > Kernel could automagically select the right one.. But I'd prefer for
> > only "non compressed" part to reach mainline for 2.6. Feature freeze
...
> You shouldn't be to extreme in you eagerness to trim things. You should
> always take in mind what would be good for the user, not only the
> developer.

We are trying to merge into stable series. "Good for developer"
takes priority here. And likely patching compression in is easier
than patching swsusp2+compression....
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/