Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?

[Stefan Smietanowski]

Giuliano Pochini wrote:

> On 26-Mar-2004 David Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> > As for "another processor", another from what processor? There is just this
> > one file. We have here a file that is allegedly distributed under the terms
> > of the GPL. It is, however, obfuscated and not the preferred form for making
> > modifications.
>
>
> It's my turn to make flames grow higher :)
> And about binary data which is not executed by any processor ?  Some
> cards have ASIC chips that must be programmed to make the card do
> something other than consuming power. That "code" is *not* a program
> and it's always shipped in binary form.

Shipped - yes, but how is it modified (ie edited) ?

Using a special program? That's fine then. Using a hex editor? That's
also fine. Using a VHDL compiler ? Then they need to give out the VHDL
code to it I believe. But hell, what do I know, when moving over to
hardware it's uncertain how the GPL would apply, at least to me,
and of course IANAL.

// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/