Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?

[Stefan Smietanowski]

Hi Dumitru.

> > /*
> >     This file is under the GPL, yada yada
> > */
> > #include "things.h"
> >
> > void some_func(void)
> > {
> >   does_something();
> > }
> >
> > char firmware[]={0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07};
> >
> > void upload_firmware(void)
> > {
> >   do_upload(firmware);
> > }
> >
> > --
> >
> > Then it seems clear to me that the firmware is under the GPL because it
> > is PART of the GPL'd file.
>
>
>
> If you're right, then the "binary" of the firmware it's GPL, not the
> source of the firmware, because that's what you have in this case :)
>
> You can have that ? GPL the binary but not the source ? :)

Not as far as I know, you can't put the resulting binary under a
different license than the source, but hey, IANAL :)

That would make all sorts of nasty implications if it was possible.

// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/