Re: Fw: potential /dev/urandom scalability improvement

[David Mosberger]

>>>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:15:32 -0600, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:

  Matt> Ok, previous observation made no sense; I should really be taking a
  Matt> nap right now. Hopefully this next one will make more sense: it ought
  Matt> to be ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp as the zero-byte spinlock struct
  Matt> still forces alignment.

Makes tons of sense, agreed.

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/