Re: Non-Exec stack patches

[Ingo Molnar]

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Now, what should the kernel do if the executable requests
> EXSTACK_DISABLE_X but the kernel cannot do that?  Is it not a bit
> misleading/dangerous to permit the executable to run anyway?

it's not really a problem. We already ignore the !X bit on x86.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/